Re: [talk-au] [OSM-legal-talk] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

2011-06-21 Thread Tim Challis
Did anybody else read this and also think, Monkey see 'CT', monkey respond with irrelevant wiki page.? Steve: Is right, because he stuck to the stated facts. Nick: Is right because his full statement ended with the line However I also can't see exactly how the published statement meets this

Re: [talk-au] [OSM-legal-talk] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

2011-06-21 Thread Grant Slater
On 21 June 2011 09:39, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: On 21 June 2011 05:46, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: Hang on, here's Nearmap's statement: All such additions or edits submitted to OSM prior to 17 June 2011 may be held and continue to be used by OSM under the

[talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

2011-06-21 Thread Nick Hocking
My 8.5 cents. Ban me! Tim. Tim, I think that you may have overvalued yourself, But that is certainly no reasn to ban you. Cheers Nick ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au