Re: [talk-au] Censorship

2011-11-03 Thread Christoph Donges
I think OSM is doing a decent job of damaging itself, it doesn't need Liz or John Smith's help. On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Nick Hocking wrote: > John H wrote > > "To each his own. I look up Liz and John S and value their opinions. > And I want to hear and consider their criticisms, even if

Re: [talk-au] Censorship

2011-11-03 Thread Nick Hocking
John H wrote "To each his own. I look up Liz and John S and value their opinions. And I want to hear and consider their criticisms, even if I don't always agree with them in the final analysis." Hi John, I've got to disagree here. In my opinoion, Liz and John S (and a couple of others) have, f

Re: [talk-au] Censorship

2011-11-03 Thread John Henderson
On 04/11/11 11:09, Steve Coast wrote: I disagree. Moderation is the only way to stop this channel being filled with diatribes and I'm glad that the moderator(s) are being reasonable enough to let the better emails through. To each his own. I look up Liz and John S and value their opinions. An

Re: [talk-au] Censorship

2011-11-03 Thread John Henderson
On 04/11/11 11:09, Steve Coast wrote: I disagree. Moderation is the only way to stop this channel being filled with diatribes and I'm glad that the moderator(s) are being reasonable enough to let the better emails through. To each his own. I look up Liz and John S and value their opinions. An

Re: [talk-au] Censorship

2011-11-03 Thread Andrew Laughton
On 4 November 2011 08:09, Steve Coast wrote: > I disagree. Moderation is the only way to stop this channel being > filled with diatribes and I'm glad that the moderator(s) are being > reasonable enough to let the better emails through. > > Steve > But who moderates the moderators ? It is the me

Re: [talk-au] Censorship

2011-11-03 Thread Steve Coast
I disagree. Moderation is the only way to stop this channel being filled with diatribes and I'm glad that the moderator(s) are being reasonable enough to let the better emails through. Steve From: John Henderson Sent: 11/3/2011 3:06 PM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Censorshi

Re: [talk-au] Mini Roundabouts.

2011-11-03 Thread Ian Sergeant
Hi, But that is different to what you said in your original email, and different to what it says on the wiki page you originally referenced. So given those three choices, I think I tend to agree with the view on the mini_roundabout wiki page you cited originally. Adding the same tag to every obj

Re: [talk-au] Censorship

2011-11-03 Thread John Henderson
On 04/11/11 06:54, Liz wrote: I'm still censored ('moderated'). I have had posts 'approved' and other posts not approved. I guess the logic of the argument was too much for the 'moderator'. It's a shame when you have to hope someone who isn't on the censored list will quote your post to get it a

Re: [talk-au] Mini Roundabouts.

2011-11-03 Thread Ross Scanlon
As per here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction mini_roundabouts are rendered by default as anti-clockwise so if they existed in Australia we would have to add direction=clockwise. Cheers Ross On 03/11/11 12:37, Ian Sergeant wrote: On 2 November 2011 23:54, Ross Scanlon mailt