Re: [talk-au] The OSM ladder

2012-10-17 Thread Nick Hocking
Ben wrote "Also, thank you for fixing those track sections at St Marys. Do you know what happened there? Given there was a derailment there 2 months ago, I find this a spooky co-incidence..." Co-incidently I was in Sydney for the day, on that day, for a work meeting and as I w

[talk-au] (no subject)

2012-10-17 Thread Nick Hocking
John wrote "I've been giving you a bit of a hand there, but mainly outside Canberra" Thanks John, all help very much appreciated. Once I finish Canberra I will start helping out to clear "keep right" errors in Sydney. Keep right is the best method, in m,y view, since it gives immediate feedba

Re: [talk-au] Lots of amenities ?

2012-10-17 Thread Stephen Hope
David, It's up to the rendering engine how it wants to display the POI's. It doesn't matter how far apart they are, if you zoom out enough they'll overlap anyway. The thing to remember is we provide the data, the people who render the maps decide what to do with it. If they're making a static m

Re: [talk-au] Lots of amenities ?

2012-10-17 Thread Richard Weait
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:10 AM, wrote: > > Thanks Ben, but maybe I'm a bit slow today ? > > If there are multiple nodes all on (about) the same spot, then the rendering > engines show only one. I guess its the 'top' one. If they are just a bit > further apart, then you might see part of the lowe

Re: [talk-au] Lots of amenities ?

2012-10-17 Thread dbannon
  Thanks Ben, but maybe I'm a bit slow today ? If there are multiple nodes all on (about) the same spot, then the rendering engines show only one. I guess its the 'top' one. If they are just a bit further apart, then you might see part of the lower ones. Not a good look either way. Perhaps its j