Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

I have been following this topic on a casual basis (ie I don't feel passionately about it), but I think that what you have written sounds fine. I guess that you will hear from people that feel passionately against your views, but those that think that what you have written makes sense might form

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

On 13/11/12 20:29, Ian Steer wrote: I have been following this topic on a casual basis (ie I don't feel passionately about it), but I think that what you have written sounds fine. I guess that you will hear from people that feel passionately against your views, but those that think that what

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

=52.51448lon=13.40603layers=B000TF -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20121113/98cc87a0/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:29:26

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

For rendering, no surface= or surface=asphalt/concrete/paved would produce the current rendering. Any other surface= would produce a dashed line/casing. To me that's a relatively simple distinction that would be more appealing to those maintaining the renderers. I've been working on this