Hi Daniel,
The first step should be to find out if they are willing to have their data
relicenced under our licence?
CC-BY data is nice, and means that the data owner is likely only seeking
attribution (which we do provide) but my understanding is that it is still
insufficient for us to use
The only issue with CC BY is that some data owners believe that attribution
reasonable to the medium is more than the ODbL guarantees which allows
notices in a location . where users would be likely to look for it such as
a wiki page linked from /copyright or in the case of produced works, a
I crunched some numbers comparing AU planet extracts from today and prior
to the redaction commencing. Although they were for my personal
edification, I thought I'd share them.
We have about 70,000 km of additional mapped unclassified and residential
road now than we did before the redaction
Ian, thanks for the interesting data. I believe we are all somewhat
relieved that we are recovering from the redaction process relatively
fast, if not faster than expected.
Simon
PS: There is however still room for a large mapping party in Sydney to
collect street names :-)
Am 25.05.2013
I'm just writing an email now to seek a similar agreement for
sa.data.gov.au as for data.gov.au
Alex
On 25/05/2013 5:23 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
The only issue with CC BY is that some data owners believe that
attribution reasonable to the medium is more than the ODbL
guarantees which allows
5 matches
Mail list logo
