> It seems the point of the three relations is to identify which parts
of the trail are accessible to which categories of users. How do you
intend to encapsulate that info?
No such problem. There is one and only one official route that walker, MTB and
horse are able to take on; ie the existing 3
On 30 November 2013 14:56, Mander Li wrote:
> No such problem. There is one and only one official route that walker, MTB
> and horse are able to take on; ie the existing 3 relations should be exactly
> the same.
Cool. So obviously you have the right idea that they should be de-duplicated.
> The
2 matches
Mail list logo
