Hi,

I've been populating addr:city with the thing in Australia we call the suburb. This seems to be supported by the definition on the wiki as this seems to say that the addr:* keys defines a postal address.

I've been playing around with mkgmap to Garmin and whatever happens, the more addresses the better. I've been playing with Osmhunter, an IOS app which makes it fun, although a bit slow.

Alex

On 14/10/2014 11:10 AM, Ben Kelley wrote:

Hi.

In OSM (for Australia), suburb=town, which is admin_level=9 for admin boundaries. We don't define the boundary of the wider metropolitan area.

To be honest I'm not sure of the value in adding this to addresses. The location of the address (within admin boundaries) will determine this, along with any street related to the address.

That is, it's probably better to let routing software infer the town, rather than re-enter it for every address.

  - Ben Kelley.

--
Ben Kelley
Sent from my Nexus 7

On 14 Oct 2014 11:19, "David Bannon" <dban...@internode.on.net <mailto:dban...@internode.on.net>> wrote:


    As far as routing engines go, my guess is City=Town=Suburb, they would
    dump them all into one box and sort.

    But I confess I don't see them as interchangeable in other contexts.
    Difficult question Nicholas !

    David


    On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 23:54 +0000, Nicholas G Lawrence wrote:
    > When I use the in-browser editor iD, and create a building
    outline to tag, it offers up addr:city as a tag, but not addr:suburb
    >
    > Of course, I can add a new tag addr:suburb easily enough, but it
    is a couple more steps.
    >
    > So the path of least resistance is to populate the tag addr:city
    and leave blank addr:suburb
    >
    > Personally, I am leaning towards addr:city = Coorparoo as it
    fits the convention of addressing letters as you point out.
    >
    > But I'd like to adhere to the established convention in Australia.
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Nick
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: David Bannon [mailto:dban...@internode.on.net
    <mailto:dban...@internode.on.net>]
    > Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014 9:21 AM
    > To: Nicholas G Lawrence
    > Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
    > Subject: Re: [talk-au] street addressing city or suburb?
    >
    >
    > Nicholas, generally, when addressing an envelope for example,
    we'd say -
    >
    > somestreet,
    > Coorparoo,
    > Queensland, postcode
    >
    > We'd reserve the use of "Brisbane" to an address in the CBD
    itself. Or so I think...
    >
    > Apply the same principle here do you think ?
    >
    > David
    >
    > On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 23:09 +0000, Nicholas G Lawrence wrote:
    > > Hi all,
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > What is the convention for tagging an address for a residential
    > > property in a suburb (Coorparoo) in a city (Brisbane)?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > addr:city = “Brisbane”
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Or
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > addr:city = “Coorparoo”
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Or
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > addr:suburb = “Coorparoo”
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Which is best for navigation and routing?


_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to