Re: [talk-au] Discussion K: Evaluation of ACT paths audit 2012 and the OSM ACT dataset

2019-10-08 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
7 Oct 2019, 23:02 by talk-au@openstreetmap.org: > "Community paths" (official term) are the most common path type in the ACT > and correspond in the OSM ATG to the tagging: > - highway=path > - foot=designated > - bicycle=designated > - segregated=no > Are you sure that ways signed as designate

Re: [talk-au] Discussion K: Evaluation of ACT paths audit 2012 and the OSM ACT dataset

2019-10-08 Thread Andy Townsend
On 08/10/2019 09:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 7 Oct 2019, 23:02 by talk-au@openstreetmap.org: "Community paths" (official term) are the most common path type in the ACT and correspond in the OSM ATG to the tagging: - highway=path - foot=designated - bicycle=designated -

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads' conclusion

2019-10-08 Thread Warin
Ok.. I think the following can be done on the Australian Tagging Guidelines; Remove the words "not map the interior private roads in detail" from service roads https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Urban_Areas Add a new section "Private Roads" under 'Road Tagging'

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads' conclusion

2019-10-08 Thread Ben Kelley
Looks good I think.  - Ben. On 9/10/19 11:55, Warin wrote: Ok.. I think the following can be done on the Australian Tagging Guidelines; Remove the words "not map the interior private roads in detail" from service roads https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Urban

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads' conclusion

2019-10-08 Thread Andrew Davidson
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 11:56 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any objections, corrections, better words .. ??? > > No, looks good. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads' conclusion

2019-10-08 Thread Warin
Yer... I'll sleep on it. Probably think of something better tomorrow! Leave it for a couple of weeks and see. On 09/10/19 13:10, Ben Kelley wrote: Looks good I think.  - Ben. On 9/10/19 11:55, Warin wrote: Ok.. I think the following can be done on the Australian Tagging Guidelines; Remov

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads' conclusion

2019-10-08 Thread cleary
Supported. Well done. On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, at 11:55 AM, Warin wrote: > Ok.. I think the following can be done on the Australian Tagging Guidelines; > > > Remove the words "not map the interior private roads in detail" from > service roads > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Taggi

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads' conclusion

2019-10-08 Thread Ewen Hill
+1 and well done. On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 14:27, cleary wrote: > Supported. Well done. > > > > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, at 11:55 AM, Warin wrote: > > Ok.. I think the following can be done on the Australian Tagging > Guidelines; > > > > > > Remove the words "not map the interior private roads in deta

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads' conclusion

2019-10-08 Thread Ian Steer
Sounds OK (I'll have to change my mapping practices) Ian ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads' conclusion

2019-10-08 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
2 thoughts. Map the full road we can see on overhead imagery, or just up to the (usual) gate? & access=private, or =destination? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au