I’m in agreement with you that this is not the correct, widely accepted, way of
mapping these intersections.
Ways should only split at the start of physical separations. Intersections of
dual carriage ways should result in a # like pattern. Turn lanes without
physical separation should be ma
I am not familiar with particular intersections and my mapping of urban
intersections is limited. However I just looked at satellite imagery for three
of the identified intersections and the current mapping seems to be an accurate
reflection of what is on the ground. While guidelines can be ver
I do see on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations,
at least in a motorway context, it is to be mapped as one way until there
is a physical separation, which at that point it separates into separate
ways. Although it specifically describes motorways, I don't
Hello,
I'd like some assistance resolving a disagreement I'm involved with
regarding the correct mapping of dual carriageways at intersections. I
have previously mentioned this topic on the mailing list here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-September/014968.html
[1].
There's also a heap of his other changes where he has deleted the entered
Source, but hasn't fixed existing Fix-Me's (apparently mainly created by
the Microsoft Team) asking for street & roundabout names.
Thanks
Graeme
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 11:43, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Resul
Thanks!
Resulting in: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gC0 :-(
Thanks
Graeme
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 11:23, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> This might help for a start via overpass
>
>
>
> [out:json][timeout:25];
>
> (
>
> nwr["fixme"](user:"aaronsta")({{bbox}});
>
> );
>
> out meta;
>
> >;
>
> out skel qt;
This might help for a start via overpass
[out:json][timeout:25];
(
nwr["fixme"](user:"aaronsta")({{bbox}});
);
out meta;
>;
out skel qt;
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Friday, 4 March 2022 11:09 AM
To: OSM-Au
Subject: [talk-au] Mass fix-me's with very strange comments
Fixing
& on a related subject:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-March/015920.html :-(
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 23:17, wrote:
> As I said before, I don't think I'm qualified to decide what exactly, if
> anything of his changes to keep or not. So my plan was to just re
Fixing a note yesterday arvo to add a cafe in Perth
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118044124#map=19/-31.90414/115.86993&layers=N,
but when I moused over the next house just to check the street number, it
had a Fix-Me on it, saying "21".
Thinking that may be a street address, despite being
As I said before, I don't think I'm qualified to decide what exactly, if
anything of his changes to keep or not. So my plan was to just revert it all
and then invite him to discuss his changes here first and he can redo whatever
finds general approval.
To facilitate that, I've committed a few k
Hi OSM community
Regarding the case of Aaronsta's edits.
I have been unsuccessful for the last week in contacting Aaron.
The DWG has placed a zero hour block on Aaron's account
Aaron has not accessed his account for the last two days and has not
read the block information.
Thorsten, for the c
11 matches
Mail list logo
