The problem is that the street in question may not be part of a formal
route.
Sydney has a lot of streets with cycle infrastructure, that aren't part
of a cycling route.
I prefer CyclOSM for that reason. CyclOSM does a better job of showing
bicycle infrastructure, as well as cycling routes.
Nelson St looks like it needs a
cycleway=shared_lane
tag.
Piper St looks OK.
cheers
Tom
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com
On 15/03/2022 11:51 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
I don't often map bikeways so need some help please.
Hi Graeme,
It appears that there is no cycle route relation attached to the street in
question.
https://www.opencyclemap.org/docs/
Maybe ask the person to add the required route (if known)
Cheers - Phil
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2022 11:52 AM
To:
I don't often map bikeways so need some help please.
Spotted two Notes saying that there are bikeways on these streets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1772764
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1772749.
I had a look at both of them & they appear to already have bike info on
them:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 07:17, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> I didn't. The thought was based on how people were tagging other
> variable lane counts: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gSc
Yeah and I think that's correct for reversible/tidal flow lanes where the
lane count in either direction or even in
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 17:02, Stéphane Guillou via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> and it looks quite similar to what Queensland Globe shows in its Roads and
> Railway layer, so there's some more validation...
>
Please note though that we do not have permission to use Qld Globe
On 14/3/22 21:26, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Where did you find the wiki suggesting lanes:conditional?
I didn't. The thought was based on how people were tagging other
variable lane counts: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gSc
Maybe I am overthinking it. If you go with what the wiki says, then
Looking at the note and the imagery I would say it's definitely
lanes=4 (if no one was parked there then you could use all 4 lanes for
driving)
psv:lanes=designated|yes|yes|yes ("Bus Lane")
access:lanes=no|yes|yes|yes (you can't use the left lane, unless you are a
psv)
Hello all,
As discussed in an earlier email chain, I have started to perform some
clean up of the wiki. To do this, I am building a set of pages in my
wiki "Userspace", to avoid causing overlap with the current versions. I
am documenting my changes/work here:
Thanks for having a go at it, Scottie. I was watching the conversation
but didn't feel confident enough in my experience with highway tagging
hierarchy.
As a local (Brisbane but not CBD), I agree the roads that directly
connect to the motorway/expressway need to at least be classified as
10 matches
Mail list logo
