Re: [talk-au] Surf Clubs & Lifesavers (Prv: Head or point on non-coastal land)

Note that the "C" part is for club in SLSC. The social part can be the community around the volunteer life saving bit. e.g. https://uminaslsc.org.au/ I agree that there are 2 parts though. The life saving part, and the "clubhouse" that also has a bar & restaurant etc. I would tag them as 2 nodes.

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

I've now asked them for proof that the church exists, but probably a waste of time. Thanks Graeme On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 12:39, Little Maps wrote: > I chanced upon the supposed new “Ballan - Corio Motorway (M8)” this > morning too. This must be a complete fabrication. It goes straight through

[talk-au] Surf Clubs & Lifesavers (Prv: Head or point on non-coastal land)

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 17:31, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have a similar difficulty with club=surf_life_saving, > emergency=lifesaver, lifesaver=base ... as that does not render. If put > on the building then the name of the club renders.. Having gone along the > coast of NSW and pu

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

I chanced upon the supposed new “Ballan - Corio Motorway (M8)” this morning too. This must be a complete fabrication. It goes straight through the Brisbane Ranges NP and there would have been an outcry if such a road was even proposed, let alone completed. I fully support reverting all of the ch

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

There's a small chance that they're proposed roads, but most likely they're made up. I think all 3 changesets from this user need reverting. However the names are suitable for the areas where they've been added, so someone has put some work into it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082655836 Bun

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

Re-posted on Discord for further comments Thanks Graeme On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 08:56, nwastra nwastra wrote: > Hi > there is some recent mapping around southern Victoria and the greater > Melbourne area that seem to be incorrect and need reverting but I am not > familiar enough with the area t

[talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

Hi there is some recent mapping around southern Victoria and the greater Melbourne area that seem to be incorrect and need reverting but I am not familiar enough with the area to be sure. The new roads seem fictitious but could be proposed approximate new routes I suppose. Could mappers more fam