Re: [talk-au] Proposed Bulk Edit: Road Route Numbering.

Here is a better option for overpass It will find those A roads where the network tag doesn’t start with AU: [out:xml][timeout:25]; {{geocodeArea:South Australia}}->.searchArea; (

Re: [talk-au] Proposed Bulk Edit: Road Route Numbering.

Hey Graeme, The network= tag for each route relation with a ref=* needs to be updated from the old scheme to use the AU:state prefix. For example network=S in Queensland becomes network=AU:QLD:S. Phil included a really useful overpass query that I'm now going to be using to track where I

Re: [talk-au] Proposed Bulk Edit: Road Route Numbering.

Hey Phil, Thank you so much for your efforts so far! The tags on the relations are much more valuable as they tend to be used by newer and more recently updated data consumers. The network tags on the individual ways are more likely to be legacy supported Ideally both would be updated at

Re: [talk-au] Proposed Bulk Edit: Road Route Numbering.

Hi Dian, I have done all the route relations for the A, B and C roads in Tassie and added the network=AU:TAS. I wasn’t aware that it was also needed on the individual ways?? I understand they have the corresponding ref tag (A1, B22 etc) but is there a need for the network tag on all the

Re: [talk-au] Proposed Bulk Edit: Road Route Numbering.

I did some work on some of the relations prior to going on holidays. I can take over where I left off, but it won’t be for another week. Maybe a good starting point for anyone would be to go through the relations I’ve already done on and change the tags on those ways. See the appropriate

Re: [talk-au] Proposed Bulk Edit: Road Route Numbering.

On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 20:51, Dian Ågesson wrote: > I will continue updating relations where I can, but any help would be > greatly appreciated tagging highway segments. > Happy to help where I can, Dian. What's involved? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Proposed Bulk Edit: Road Route Numbering.

Hello, Just an update regarding this piece of work. I was able to complete a bulk edit in Western Australia, however I found that it took a significant amount of effort. WA is the "easiest" of the states to convert, as it has less numbered routes and no alphanumeric routes to worry about.