Re: [talk-au] Tagging Culverts on Roads

On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 13:54, Andrew Hughes wrote: > Yes... > > > https://vicroadsopendata-vicroadsmaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ef496e07eae049a3bb94351bc496dd6a_0/explore?location=-36.518496%2C145.313781%2C7.55 > > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ > Sorry, Andrew, but apparen

Re: [talk-au] Tagging Culverts on Roads

Yes... https://vicroadsopendata-vicroadsmaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ef496e07eae049a3bb94351bc496dd6a_0/explore?location=-36.518496%2C145.313781%2C7.55 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ --Andrew On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:01, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridal Track

Australian road tagging guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads arguably override the general OSM guidelines, and they read: highway=track: "Service and access roads that aren't part of the general road network. Generally not paved, often not public ac

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridal Track

The name should not constrain the classification of the highway (e.g. Dowling Track, Ooodnadatta Track). And, as I've commented previously in other threads, the DCS NSW Base Map can be quite outdated. However, a quick look at a YouTube video suggests that the Bridle Track should still be ta

[talk-au] NSW Bridal Track

Hi This track is now continuous having been closed due to a rock fall and road collapse at Monaghans Bluff. Given the importance of the road and that it is not really a 'track' in the OSM sense (Roads for mostly agricultural or forestry uses) ... and that the DCS Base Map places it at least