On 3/10/23 20:40, Warin wrote:
The 'government/community services' might be ordered by there total
numbers?
PO (including local PO agents)
Police
Doctors (theses seam scarcer than Police?_
Hospitals
OK, so there was a maths error in my example. I was suggesting that the
population
A brief summary of the options for this type of situation (not just this
particular edit, but similar edits in the past and probably future):
1. Revert the change sets (in the absence of more information)
2. Partial revert, with a change in tags
3. Leave the deletion as it is.
For this
On 3/10/23 19:41, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 2/10/23 21:53, Little Maps wrote:
As I understand your message, we have and/or can get population data
for a small proportion of places in Aus (probably with comprehensive
data for most larger places and less data for the many smaller ones).
There
On 3/10/23 14:27, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 23:48, Yuchen Pei wrote:
On Mon 2023-10-02 21:42:01 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> [... 15 lines elided]
> It's been a while since I worked on this, but I believe it was the
> matching of existing OSM addresses to
On 2/10/23 21:53, Little Maps wrote:
As I understand your message, we have and/or can get population data
for a small proportion of places in Aus (probably with comprehensive
data for most larger places and less data for the many smaller ones).
There are two classes of problems:
1. Urban
5 matches
Mail list logo
