Sure thing Tony.
That's one of the questions I've got for him when he gets back.
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 16:19, wrote:
> Hi Graeme
>
> I have been attempting to set up a dialogue between Parks Victoria and
> OSM, so far unsuccessfully. I think its a step forward if NWPS wants
> t
Hi Graeme
I have been attempting to set up a dialogue between Parks Victoria and
OSM, so far unsuccessfully. I think its a step forward if NWPS wants
to liaise with a Liaison Officer. I would give them a Liaison Officer
and at the same time encourage them into the community. The OSM
Liais
On Nov 1, 2023, at 10:46 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 16:35, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Tried a test message from an outside e-mail but doesn't seem to have come
> through.
>
> Do you have to be subscribed to the list to be able to post to it?
>
> Yes
As I say, a low bar
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 16:35, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Tried a test message from an outside e-mail but doesn't seem to have come
> through.
>
> Do you have to be subscribed to the list to be able to post to it?
>
Yes
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@
Tried a test message from an outside e-mail but doesn't seem to have come
through.
Do you have to be subscribed to the list to be able to post to it?
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:02, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Lots of the detail is there already
>
>
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi
Thanks everybody for your thoughts.
As per Steve's comment, here is probably the easiest contact point due to
not needing an account, but we'll see what other suggestions are made?
I was wondering if a general OSM-AU / OSM-Oceania e-mail address, probably
as part of OSGeo, would help with this so
Lots of the detail is there already
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths
Never know, they might even get to like mapping and start adding lots more
detail like “operator” to existing tacks and notes to those under rehabilitation
Cheer
In the context of the tracks, there is always the risk that if you delete
something that you don't think should be there, that someone else re-maps
it because they see it in the aerial photo. (As we discussed.)
I guess the best is that we could detail a preferred approach (e.g. in
Australian taggi
Hi Folks,
Personally I think its best if they do become editors as well as
mailing/forum/discord participants. It's the best way to learn the ecosystem
and I have no doubt that their data group will have some GIS knowledge etc
so it wont be too onerous on them to participate.
The difficulty is th
My two cents.
Our forum and Discord require "accounts" to be registered at the OSM level (via
OAuth2 by registering for a volunteer Contributor account to OSM) and at "the
Discord level," something else again. A mailing list "merely" requires an
email address as an "account" to be registered w
Due to the structure of OSM, we don't have a single "Liaison Officer", so
it's best if they join the list here and join the community discussion. I'm
happy to engage directly with them if they prefer a single point of
contact, but I'd need to stress that no single person is an authority
within OSM
DWG have received a
"*Request for a Liaison Officer*:
To enhance the accuracy of OpenStreetMap data pertaining to the NSW
National Parks and Wildlife Service"
This has come up in regard to tracks that they say they have previously
requested be deleted (I'm contacting them to confirm just which?)
12 matches
Mail list logo
