Sounds great and I look forward to it :-)
On 7/11/2011 6:55 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
Hi Steve,
Yes, I've got my tickets to SOTM and I hope you bring all your hats
with you.
In my spare time I develop some specialised applications for various
sports/pastimes and I think OSM can be useful
I'm speaking strictly personally here, posting to talk@ and opengeodata.
OSM often crosses bridges in it's growth. Mostly they're technical, like
introducing color maps, rendering new things or speeding up the system. We have
a much more ugly bridge to cross in front of us.
Would you want to
On 7/11/2011 6:13 AM, Sam Couter wrote:
Andrew Harveyandrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
That is, if OSM were as rigorous as Debian we wouldn't allow this as
it is in violation of point 8 of the DFSG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_Free_Software_Guidelines
I'm glad somebody has mentioned
It would be wonderful if people from talk-au were able to apply for
this, and come to SOTM. It's a super fun event.
Steve
On 6/19/2011 2:35 PM, Mikel Maron wrote:
Hi
The OpenStreetMap conference, State of the Map, is offering
scholarships. Details below. Note that nominations close on
On Jul 10, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Murn wrote:
I think the biggest problem people in .au had was that there were some
issues which were specific to the Australian usage of OSM (imports of
gov data, etc). Those who sought to change the licence claimed to be
listening to people, but when
On Jul 10, 2011, at 7:22 PM, John Smith wrote:
You keep making the same mistakes, and of course nothing is being
resolved because you stick your head in the sand and try and pretend
it will just magically take care of itself, all you are achieving
lately is showing how arrogant you can be and
On Jul 10, 2011, at 7:45 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 11 July 2011 12:42, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2011, at 7:34 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 11 July 2011 12:30, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
It's not worth my time responding to messages like this.
I wrote
It's been pointed out that I'm not replying to hundreds of messages from
John Smith, Anthony and friends.
I don't see them as they're automatically deleted. I find life is better
without having the trolls fill my inbox.
However, if I have missed any reasonable points in there then feel free
On 7/7/2011 9:37 PM, James Andrewartha wrote:
On 8 July 2011 11:26, SteveCst...@asklater.com wrote:
This reads like you disagree with taxation or death. I do too, but there's not
much I can do about it. The vast majority of people are happy with where we are
at and now it's down to people
stopped, that's right, there was no other aerial
imagery. I just checked again now and Bing actually seems pretty ok...
Maybe I'll start again sometime...but honestly, I'm not really in the
mood lately. Maybe after a steak dinner or two... :P
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Steve Coast st
On 7/8/2011 5:04 AM, Sam Couter wrote:
SteveCst...@asklater.com wrote:
No, John smith and friends are a separate issue, they troll many different
discussions.
Who are and friends? I only watch talk-au so if there's trolling going
on elsewhere I haven't seen it. What I have seen is you
On 7/8/2011 4:28 AM, Sam Couter wrote:
Also, your frame of reference is with OSM up and running and having these kinds
of relationships. When I started OSM we had no data at all and nobody wanted to
give us data under any license, let alone cc. So those of us who climbed the
mountain to get
Anthony
The reason we have a hostile relationship is because of all your
spamming and trolling. You were kicked from the legal list, the only
person I'm aware of to have managed that.
I suspect the real reason you want a nice relationship is funding and
other benefits we've worked hard for,
On 7/8/2011 2:01 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:05:28 -0700
Steve Coastst...@asklater.com wrote:
If you go look at talk@ you'll find a lot of history from the people
who now inhabit this list. In fact, several of them have either been
banned or moderated.
big snip of
FOSMs not going anywhere for some simple reasons.
The people running it are ineffective, the data will be incompatible
when OSM switches, fosm doesn't have any of the agreements to derive
data from aerial imagery. I could go on, but those are the big ticket items.
Everyone should be aware of
On 7/7/2011 7:15 AM, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
mailto:st...@asklater.com wrote:
FOSMs not going anywhere for some simple reasons.
The people running it are ineffective, the data will be
incompatible when OSM switches, fosm doesn't
On 7/7/2011 7:40 AM, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
mailto:st...@asklater.com wrote:
You've been very successful at perverting certain sections of the
community, Australia being a good example ...
Steve, please don't
Why did you stop then? Is there no aerial imagery where you are other
than nearmap?
On 7/7/2011 8:03 AM, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
mailto:st...@asklater.com wrote:
...I believe we should spend energy enlightening aerial
This is exactly right.
On 7/6/2011 5:35 AM, Chris Barham wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 21:29, Andrew Harveyandrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Are you moving to the fosm db? If so, great! Less problems with trying to
merge your data into fosm, and we can all get back to mapping.
On 7/6/2011 3:20 PM, Sam Couter wrote:
Steve Coastst...@asklater.com wrote:
This is exactly right.
It's only exactly right if you don't have a problem with the new
licence, with the process by which it was implemented, with mass
deletion of data, with the proliferation of incompatible open
20 matches
Mail list logo
