On 2 December 2011 09:43, Richard Weait wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
>
> Are you the same person as user id:28334 "laughton_andrew" who has
> declined? If you think that government data inclusion is likely to
> convince other mappers, is it enough for you? Do you have other
> issues that you wish to s
On 02/12/11 12:27, Andrew Laughton wrote:
I would like a copy of the map before these deletes are made for my
GPS, has someone done this before these deletes were done ?
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for, but I've got a copy of
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/australia-oceania.osm.
com]
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2011 12:42 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] A way to go
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Andrew Laughton
wrote:
> On 2 December 2011 07:20, John Henderson wrote:
>>
>> On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
>>
>>>
of these tools (or discussion thereof) that
would assist with remapping?
From: Richard Weait
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2011 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] A way to go and missing towns
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, El Se
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, El Segundo Can't win
wrote:
> Late to the conversation but..
>
> First up, from people have said, what cc-cleaner is doing is shocking
> vandalism, whether they intend it or not.
I'm disappointed by deletions without remapping. One way to defeat
that is by rem
Late to the conversation but..
First up, from people have said, what cc-cleaner is doing is shocking
vandalism, whether they intend it or not.
In a worst case scenario, all non-CT compliant information will be expunged on
1st April. There is no need to delete it (especially manually) befo
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Andrew Laughton
wrote:
> On 2 December 2011 07:20, John Henderson wrote:
>>
>> On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
>>
>>> Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
>>> to waiting until March 31 and running a script.
>>>
>>> So removin
On 2 December 2011 07:20, John Henderson wrote:
> On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
>
> Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
>> to waiting until March 31 and running a script.
>>
>> So removing data from decliners and remapping it, and reaching out
>> to tho
On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
to waiting until March 31 and running a script.
So removing data from decliners and remapping it, and reaching out
to those who haven't yet responded is valid and valuable.
Thanks for
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mark Pulley wrote:
> Has a date been set for the removal of CC-BY-SA-only data yet?
Before 01 April 2012
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2011/11/16/odbl-progress/
Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
to waiting until March 31 and run
I've been thinking for a while about the best way to remove CC-BY-SA-only data
when the time comes. As already noted, some people have started already by
deleting large areas of data and re-adding from bing (losing all the tags) -
which at best may be unnecessary, and at present (as no date has
Ian wrote
-
"I started a thread on talk a while ago about how to handle this situation,
but it went nowhere, with the thread (as usual) hijacked to talk about
licencing issues unr
I started a thread on talk a while ago about how to handle this situation,
but it went nowhere, with the thread (as usual) hijacked to talk about
licencing issues unrelated to the practicality of implementation.
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk@openstreetmap.org/msg39790.html
My suggestion was a
Richard Wrote..
""
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Nick Hocking
wrote:
> PAST
>
> 1) decliner traces a way into OSM
> 2) acceptor surveys road and copies in street sign info and turn
restriction
> info into OSM
> 3) decliner bot-a a
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
> PAST
>
> 1) decliner traces a way into OSM
> 2) acceptor surveys road and copies in street sign info and turn restriction
> info into OSM
> 3) decliner bot-a adds maxspeed info
> 4) decliner bot-b fixes incorrect maxspeed tag
> 5) decliner add
PAST
1) decliner traces a way into OSM
2) acceptor surveys road and copies in street sign info and turn
restriction info into OSM
3) decliner bot-a adds maxspeed info
4) decliner bot-b fixes incorrect maxspeed tag
5) decliner adds numlanes info
6) acceptor realigns way to smooth it out
7) acceptor
16 matches
Mail list logo