Thanks.
I guess we have nothing to lose, so I'd be happy to write them a nice
email :-D
Does anyone know if they have been approached previously and how they
may have responded? I'd rather not go charging in digging up old
skeletons, if you know what I mean...
Regards
Darren
On 21/12/12
That looks better to me for the streets I'm familiar with. Eg if you
search for Gloucester Ave
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.766784lon=151.124839zoom=18
(which is down southerly end) at OSM, it shows as Macquarie Park 2113 in
the search results. On your map it shows as 2073 which is
Well, after more digging, seems I had overlooked the obvious, which I
think you were assuming I already had found
We already have permission from ABS data.gov.au
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kosmos_postal_code_rendering_rules/au#Postal_Codes
to use their geo data for postcodes etc.
Hi again
I've been mapping around the West Pymble area and noticed that the
postcode was wrong. Looking around some of the streets, they were
associated with Macquarie Park which is the other side of Lane Cove
River! In short, there are serious and obvious errors.
So, I followed some of the
Am 20.12.2012 16:08, schrieb Darren Burt:
Now, my basic understanding of the 'new' OSM license is that the OSM
database may be used for commercial activities, which would put it in
direct conflict with the Auspost database usage requirements.
Can anyone confirm that this is the case? Or at
:-(
I just looked at the license you referenced and it is very, very restrictive.
So no.
Both the old and new OSM licenses allow commercial usage, (otherwise it would
not be an open license). Some publishers if specifically and courteously asked
*may* make an exception as OpenStreetMap
6 matches
Mail list logo
