On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:55 +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:58:04 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 January 2011 09:21, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
where you are.
On 26/01/2011 16:12, David Murn wrote:
The only issue I would have, is with the spelling of licence. Steve
suggested licensed but as OSM is traditionally British English,
shouldnt licenced=yes/no be used?
taginfo shows licenced=yes has 2 usages where licensed=yes has 9, so its
early enough to
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:12 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
The only issue I would have, is with the spelling of licence. Steve
suggested licensed but as OSM is traditionally British English, shouldnt
licenced=yes/no be used?
Although it's a non-issue here as pointed out below,
On 27 January 2011 08:58, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Although it's a non-issue here as pointed out below, we really should
get a policy on this. IMHO tags should reflect whatever makes the most
sense to the most people, whether that's British, American or
otherwise.
I'd agree,
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 15:33 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:08 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo
Yeah, but they're not mutually exclusive. All four combinations exist,
including licensed *and* byo (with corkage,
On 26 January 2011 09:21, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
where you are. In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST
have a liquor license. In [2]Victoria, a BYO license (actually a
permit) is for places
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:58:04 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 January 2011 09:21, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
where you are. In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST
have a
On 26/01/2011 10:21 AM, David Murn wrote:
Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
where you are. In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST
have a liquor license. In [2]Victoria, a BYO license (actually a
permit) is for places that dont have a liquor
On 24 January 2011 06:06, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced
restaurants?
Not all restaurants are licensed...
amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo
___
Talk-au
seems sensible as the tag can be applied generally
cheers
On 25/01/2011 10:08 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 January 2011 06:06, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced
restaurants?
Not all
On 24/01/2011 23:08, John Smith wrote:
Not all restaurants are licensed...
amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo
Sounds good to me - thanks.
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:08 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo
Yeah, but they're not mutually exclusive. All four combinations exist,
including licensed *and* byo (with corkage, usually), and licensed
*and not* byo.
licensed=yes/no
Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced
restaurants?
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
13 matches
Mail list logo
