On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, James Livingston
wrote:
> If in future we want to map both the low and high water marks, the
> obvious thing to do would be to use coastline for the low water mark,
> water=tidal[0] for the middle area, and beach/whatever for everything
> that's dry.
If you do it
Hi
I agree that it makes sense to have the coastline at low tide mark with a tidal
zone area before the beach but accept that people's opinions on what is a beach
differ.
I will stick with the approach that coastline is high water mark but as
mentioned how you do this from Bing is hit and mis
On 9 January 2013 09:53, James Livingston wrote:
> On 8 January 2013 20:32, Brett Russell wrote:
>> Assuming that I am reading OSM instructions correct the beach is suppose to
>> only extend to the high water mark so the coastline and beach should have a
>> one to one relationship on the water si
On 8 January 2013 20:32, Brett Russell wrote:
> Assuming that I am reading OSM instructions correct the beach is suppose to
> only extend to the high water mark so the coastline and beach should have a
> one to one relationship on the water side. But then I have been wrong
> before with OSM.
I t
com
> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:01:09 +1100
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Coastline and beaches
> To: brussell...@live.com.au
>
> Worth keeping in mind that the natural=coastline is at the mean high
> water mark, but I would think that the extent of the beach would go
> out to sea to
Hi
Looking as always to get better at OSM and read up on beaches and coastlines.
Noticed that coastlines need care so not inclined to play with them too much
but a question on the relationship to a beach. Ideally one side of the beach
ends in water so should the beach be linked to the coast
6 matches
Mail list logo
