[talk-au] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

SUMMARY -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 From: Lauri Kytömaa To: t...@openstreetmap.org Nop wrote: >I think we should step back one step. >The discussion here seems about to fall victim to the same mechanisms

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Liz wrote: > SUMMARY > > Trying to keep my comment general at first to find what are the needs: > what should be in the highway tag and what are "local factors". This > turned into a stream of thoughts but hopefully coherent enough to > breed some more refined thoug

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Roy Wallace wrote: > Nice work Liz, thought I might comment on just a few things you raised. not my work Roy!! -- BOFH excuse #297: Too many interrupts ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap