On 14/04/10 09:06, John Smith wrote:
> There is a handful of people that already do this, and imho it's best
> to leave it up to them to prevent accidents and edit wars.
Understood. But at least I now see why it's best to leave potential
"reverts" in their pristine state.
John H
_
Hi,
As reported here the user has asked for help reverting... I will leave
it to the people who know what they are doing to follow this up.
Cheers
Neal
On 14/04/2010, at 7:25 AM, Liz wrote:
From: Frederik Ramm
Date: 14 April 2010 6:56:09 AM
To: John Smith
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subjec
On 14 April 2010 08:04, John Henderson wrote:
> OK - time I did some research on how to revert things I guess.
There is a handful of people that already do this, and imho it's best
to leave it up to them to prevent accidents and edit wars.
___
Talk-au
On 14/04/10 07:51, John Smith wrote:
> It's always better if they're reverted cleanly...
OK - time I did some research on how to revert things I guess.
John H
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
On 14 April 2010 07:46, John Henderson wrote:
> On 14/04/10 07:25, Liz wrote:
>> the user has replied, apologised, and asked for help in reverting
>> several of his change sets. I will revert the following changesets for
>> him unless beaten by the .au team:
>
> I've cleaned up the duplication
On 14/04/10 07:25, Liz wrote:
> the user has replied, apologised, and asked for help in reverting
> several of his change sets. I will revert the following changesets for
> him unless beaten by the .au team:
I've cleaned up the duplications in much of the ACT (but not all). I
assume that won
--- Begin Message ---
John,
the user has replied, apologised, and asked for help in reverting
several of his change sets. I will revert the following changesets for
him unless beaten by the .au team:
#4341783
#4341031
#4339058
#4338519
#4332119
#4330945
#4330174
#4330103
Bye
Frederik
--
7 matches
Mail list logo