On Mon, 2 May 2011 12:40:55 +0800
Andrew Gregory wrote:
> Yes, it's all based on surveys where I've gone there in person. (How
> else would I get the name?)
I have been to towns already traced from Nearmap and simply got the road
names. Not been up and down every street so they are tagged
sourc
with source=nearmap doesn't solve this.
>
> - Ben Kelley
>
> Sent from my HTC
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Murn
> Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 10:17
> To: Andrew Gregory
> Cc: OSM Australian Talk List
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap user
Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have accepted the
new CTs and ODbL?
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:18 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> In any case, I expect that when it comes time to actually apply the
> new license, any source=nearmap data will disappear leaving behind all
&g
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 12:40 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> > Unless youve realigned the ways based on GPS tracks after you traced
> > from nearmap, tagging the ways as source=survey is incorrect. You
> > can add a source:name=survey or similar, but if youve traced from a
> > source, just because
On 2 May 2011 08:17, David Murn wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:18 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
>
> > Thankfully, I've been careful to use source=nearmap. I've also been
> > making a point to go around and survey streets I've traced, check
> > their alignment, name them and set source=survey.
>
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:18 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> Thankfully, I've been careful to use source=nearmap. I've also been
> making a point to go around and survey streets I've traced, check
> their alignment, name them and set source=survey.
Unless youve realigned the ways based on GPS track
On 26 April 2011 21:24, David Murn wrote:
>
> How many OSM users have accepted the new terms, without fully
> understanding that sources they have used in the past prohibit them from
> doing so.
>
> Using my australian test extract from 21/03/2011, I found that 3390
> users have made edits in the
On 27 April 2011 04:15, David Groom wrote:
> But I thought that Nearmap has said that they did not think the CT's were
> compatible with the use of their data. As I understood it this had nothing
> to do with CC-BY-SA or ODbL.
>
> So the issue as I understand it is the CT's, and so anyone who has
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:24:09 +1000
David Murn wrote:
> Using my australian test extract from 21/03/2011, I found that 3390
> users have made edits in the area of interest (the Australian extract
> available on osmaustralia.org).
>
> Of these 3390 users, 536 have used the tag source=nearmap at le
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Weait"
To: "OSM Australian Talk List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have accepted the
new CTs and ODbL?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, David Murn
wrot
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:50 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, David Murn wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering this question tonight.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > This only shows where there is clear evidence of licence violations
> > without having to look past the data's tags.
>
>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, David Murn wrote:
>
> I was wondering this question tonight.
[ ... ]
> This only shows where there is clear evidence of licence violations
> without having to look past the data's tags.
[ ... ]
> Food for thought
"Junk food" at best. ;-) OSM is currently pub
I was wondering this question tonight.
How many OSM users have accepted the new terms, without fully
understanding that sources they have used in the past prohibit them from
doing so.
So, I wrote a little script to find out and the numbers are surprising.
Using my australian test extract from 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
