If The License Change goes ahead, will that have any influence on, say, the
legality of tracing from nearmap imagery?
Does it appear as though some contributions will have to be removed if The
License Change happens?
If so, what kind of contributions?
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
Nearmap allows in their TC's to derive data, the data is under the
license of the person deriving it chooses to release it under.
The bigger issue was the AU Govt data, but that has fixed it self
since it was relicensed as cc-by from cc-by-sa
but it
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/9 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
If The License Change goes ahead, will that have any influence on, say, the
legality of tracing from nearmap imagery?
Does it appear as though some contributions will have
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
Although. If CC-BY-SA isn't likely to stand in Australia for OSM
it isn't likely to stand for anyone else either
If its good enough for the Au guvmint, who can afford lawyers, it is probably
protective in Au.
--
You have had a long-term
On 09/12/2009, at 6:38 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
it to others under a Creative Commons licence.
Does that not imply that the derived information may only be
I'm sure Alex is reading the list, but I am too :)
If there are concerns with our license, we'll work to address them - a key
goal of ours is to support OSM and that was a firm requirement when the
license was drafted.
Cheers
Ben
2009/12/9 James Livingston doc...@mac.com
On 09/12/2009, at
I've just got a response from our legal team and this is what they say.
We are always keen to clear up any uncertainties regarding derived works.
Our requirement is that derived works are availlable to others, using a
Creative Commons style license. In other words, we share the same approach
as
7 matches
Mail list logo
