On 7/7/2016 12:35 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Hi
Even with Warin's proposed edit to the wiki guidelines, I think it is
still unclear whether its better to use the value 'private' or 'no'
for the 'access' key. (And the various transport mode keys).
For example, for tracks in national
Hi
Even with Warin's proposed edit to the wiki guidelines, I think it is
still unclear whether its better to use the value 'private' or 'no'
for the 'access' key. (And the various transport mode keys).
For example, for tracks in national parks and closed water catchments
which have more
On 7/5/2016 9:13 AM, Mark Pulley wrote:
On 2 Jul 2016, at 3:30 pm, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/2/2016 9:26 AM, Frank wrote:
OpenStreetMap Wiki page Australian Tagging Guidelines has been
changed on 1 July 2016 by Swanilli to say that the public has a legal right to
access
On 2 Jul 2016, at 3:30 pm, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/2/2016 9:26 AM, Frank wrote:
>> OpenStreetMap Wiki page Australian Tagging Guidelines has been
>> changed on 1 July 2016 by Swanilli to say that the public has a legal right
>> to access public land ...
>>
>> No!
>>
>> The
On 7/2/2016 9:26 AM, Frank wrote:
OpenStreetMap Wiki page Australian Tagging Guidelines has been
changed on 1 July 2016 by Swanilli to say that the public has a legal
right to access public land ...
No!
The NSW NPSW do legally exclude the public from certain areas and at
least vehicles from
OpenStreetMap Wiki page Australian Tagging Guidelines has been
changed on 1 July 2016 by Swanilli to say that the public has a legal right to
access public land ...
No!
The NSW NPSW do legally exclude the public from certain areas and at least
vehicles from certain tracks.
The NSW, WA, SA
6 matches
Mail list logo
