2010/1/13 Sam Couter :
> Left turn from Falcon Street onto Pacifiy Highway.
If you switch to sat view you can see there is a seperate lane for
that which makes the turn less than 90 degrees.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://list
2010/1/13 Roy Wallace :
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:17 PM, John Smith wrote:
>>
>> In this case you have to assume the turn restictions are completely
>> ignored, which if that is the case is there really any point in
>> putting them in in the first place to tell stupid things how to do
>> their j
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:17 PM, John Smith wrote:
>
> In this case you have to assume the turn restictions are completely
> ignored, which if that is the case is there really any point in
> putting them in in the first place to tell stupid things how to do
> their jobs better when the programming
John Smith wrote:
> KISS...
>
> In this case you have to assume the turn restictions are completely
> ignored, which if that is the case is there really any point in
> putting them in in the first place to tell stupid things how to do
> their jobs better when the programming should be improved?
2010/1/12 Roy Rankin :
> My experience of many years with both people and computers is that
> people often show that common sense is not that common and that
> computers have none at all. It may be just a fringe case, but I believe
> that if a turn is not prohibited then sooner or later a route wil
On 01/12/2010 07:08 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
> Likewise don't put roads that are on the same pavement on different
layers
> it's not mapping what's on the ground.
OK, I have re-read the layers tag on the map features page and it says
"This is intended to indicate actual physical separation, sho
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:57 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 21:44 +1100, Roy Rankin wrote:
> With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
>> interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
>> brings up the issue on how to best do this.
>>
>> ...
>
2010/1/12 Ross Scanlon :
> Likewise don't put roads that are on the same pavement on different layers
> it's not mapping what's on the ground.
>
> I know it's difficult with the current routers but we need to add the data
> correctly then get the routers fixed to correctly work with the turn
> and/
> There is a third solution which I have seen. Typically the interchange
> ways cross 2 other ways. Normally I think of the via in a turn relation
> being a node. I am not sure the routers work this way, but if the right
> turn lane is a separate way with a common nodes with ways it crosses
> (but
2010/1/12 Roy Rankin :
> The example I gave was a simplification to demonstrate the issues. From
> Johns response I did realize I had gotten the directions which I assumed
> is why it did not make sense to him. If you want to visualize the
> situation look at the link I supplied
> (http://www.open
The example I gave was a simplification to demonstrate the issues. From
Johns response I did realize I had gotten the directions which I assumed
is why it did not make sense to him. If you want to visualize the
situation look at the link I supplied
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.82907&
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:57 PM, wrote:
>
> Would anyone else like to comment?
Yes, but as John asked can you point us to the example? Would make it
easier to follow...
As for "2> The ways cross without a common node but are on different
layers. (Although physically using the same pavement wher
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 21:44 +1100, Roy Rankin wrote:
With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
> interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
> brings up the issue on how to best do this.
>
> ...
>
> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.82
Oops,
I meant a east bound lane(s) going south crossing the west bound lane(s).
On 01/11/2010 09:44 PM, Roy Rankin wrote:
> With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
> interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
> brings up the issue on how to
2010/1/11 Roy Rankin :
> With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
> interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
> brings up the issue on how to best do this.
>
> Picture this case. A freeway goes north-south and a dual lane east-west
> road goes
With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
brings up the issue on how to best do this.
Picture this case. A freeway goes north-south and a dual lane east-west
road goes over the freeway with a connec
16 matches
Mail list logo
