Well, I understand the resolution over Rottnest Island is better than
anywhere else, so that ought to give an idea of what they can do. But
I got the impression on the forums somewhere that they got that by
flying lower, thus requiring more passes, though I may be wrong - I
can't find it again
On 19 March 2010 11:22, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I understand the resolution over Rottnest Island is better than
anywhere else, so that ought to give an idea of what they can do. But
I thought Perth CBD was, since you can tell the direction of the
switch points on railway
On 19 March 2010 10:31, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 March 2010 11:22, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I understand the resolution over Rottnest Island is better than
anywhere else, so that ought to give an idea of what they can do. But
I thought Perth CBD
On 19 March 2010 14:27, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Both Rottnest surveys Perth CBD 15/5/09 go down to approx 3cm resolution.
Or if you want to talk in slippymap terms, zoom 23 (scale 2m). Other
surveys typically go down to zoom 21/5m.
To get the higher resolution do you fly lower
On 19 March 2010 12:32, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
To get the higher resolution do you fly lower than normal, or just
process the data more?
We fly lower.
b
--
Ben Last
Development Manager (HyperWeb)
NearMap Pty Ltd
___
Talk-au
http://www.ipernica.com/IRM/content/Movies/Nearmap_ch7.html
A couple of things that caught my attention, firstly the claim that
they artificially limit the resolution, I wonder what they really are
capable of producing.
The reporter also asked if any of the big online mapping companies
were
6 matches
Mail list logo
