Re: [talk-au] Question re footway or path for asphalt paths in National Parks

2010-10-19 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 18 October 2010 20:52, Mark Pulley wrote: > On the wiki, it suggests using highway=footway for urban footpaths and > highway=path for hiking trails. > > Which is best to use for asphalt footways in national parks (e.g. > wheelchair-friendly paths to lookouts) - should I use footway or path? >

Re: [talk-au] Question re footway or path for asphalt paths in National Parks

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Pulley
On 18/10/2010, at 10:57 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Mark Pulley wrote: On the wiki, it suggests using highway=footway for urban footpaths and highway=path for hiking trails. Where does it suggest that, about highway=path? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/

Re: [talk-au] Question re footway or path for asphalt paths in National Parks

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Bennett
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Mark Pulley wrote: > On the wiki, it suggests using highway=footway for urban footpaths and > highway=path for hiking trails. Where does it suggest that, about highway=path? It must be the most ambiguous tag ever, with at least the following meanings: - a trail of

[talk-au] Question re footway or path for asphalt paths in National Parks

2010-10-18 Thread Mark Pulley
On the wiki, it suggests using highway=footway for urban footpaths and highway=path for hiking trails. Which is best to use for asphalt footways in national parks (e.g. wheelchair-friendly paths to lookouts) - should I use footway or path? Mark P. __