Thanks all for the input.
I was just double checking because it turns out I've been using the
shelter property pretty loosely. I've got a number of them scattered
around the place which I've probably mistagged as a result.
I'll have to go back through my edits and see if I can fix them up. >_>
A
On 08/08/2009, at 6:51 PM, John Smith wrote:
> --- On Sat, 8/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au
> wrote:
>> I'd
>> say that the best solution would be
>> tourism=picnic_site;shelter/cover/rainproof=yes. The reason
>> being that it's not just a shelter, it's a picnic
>> site which happens to be under c
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Hugh Barnes wrote:
> Balls to OSM telling you what a table is for.
lots of things have been decided by people with just_not_enough_imagination
and results in Aussies s***stirring on the main talk list, just trying to
broaden their horizons
:-) :-)
__
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:53:41 +1000
Ashley Kyd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was having a conversation the other day when the purpose of
> amenity=shelter was brought into question.
>
> http://barstool.ash.ms/photos/07082009-shelter.jpg
>
> Above is a photo I took while out the other day. It's a shelt
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, Roy Wallace wrote:
> In that case you would also often find yourself using
> bbq=yes.
If you lump bbq in with the covered area you then have people tagging it as
fuel=wood and does that mean we can rip hunks off the sheltered area to put in
the bbq? :)
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
> I'd
> say that the best solution would be
> tourism=picnic_site;shelter/cover/rainproof=yes. The reason
> being that it's not just a shelter, it's a picnic
> site which happens to be under cover.
I suggested:
tourism=picnic_site
cover=yes
or drawbacks to what's happening now.
*shrug* This isn't an issue I feel strongly about.
-Brent
- Original Message -
From: Roy Wallace
Date: Saturday, August 8, 2009 5:54 pm
Subject: Re: [talk-au] amenity=shelter
To: b.schulz...@scu.edu.au
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> On
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:33 PM, wrote:
> I'd say that the best solution would be
> tourism=picnic_site;shelter/cover/rainproof=yes. The reason being that it's
> not just a shelter, it's a picnic site which happens to be under cover.
In that case you would also often find yourself using bbq=yes.
0:54 am
Subject: [talk-au] amenity=shelter
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> Hi all,
>
> I was having a conversation the other day when the purpose of
> amenity=shelter was brought into question.
>
> http://barstool.ash.ms/photos/07082009-shelter.jpg
>
> Above is a photo I took
Hi all,
I was having a conversation the other day when the purpose of
amenity=shelter was brought into question.
http://barstool.ash.ms/photos/07082009-shelter.jpg
Above is a photo I took while out the other day. It's a shelter with a
picnic area, bbq, and some benches under it. Can I clarify wh
10 matches
Mail list logo
