[talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-25 Thread John Smith
I ended up filing a bug about this: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4236 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread Steve Bennett
Hear, hear. Would be good in potlatch too. On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 5:43 PM, John Smith wrote: > I ended up filing a bug about this: > > https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4236 > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.o

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread John Smith
2009/12/26 Steve Bennett : > Hear, hear. Would be good in potlatch too. You don't need my permission to file a bug :P ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread Steve Bennett
> > You don't need my permission to file a bug :P > Please stop being an asshole. Your way of expressing yourself on these lists is extremely unpleasant. For almost every post that anyone makes, you make this snide, arrogant, completely uncalled for follow-up. If you have a useful post to make th

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread John Smith
2009/12/26 Steve Bennett : >> You don't need my permission to file a bug :P > > Please stop being an asshole. Your way of expressing yourself on these lists > is extremely unpleasant. For almost every post that anyone makes, you make > this snide, arrogant, completely uncalled for follow-up. Your

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread John Henderson
John Smith wrote: > Your post was completely useless, why didn't you just post a bug > instead of trying to make other people do it? Because some of us are yet to build the confidence for such action? John ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetma

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread John Smith
2009/12/27 John Henderson : > John Smith wrote: > >> Your post was completely useless, why didn't you just post a bug >> instead of trying to make other people do it? > > Because some of us are yet to build the confidence for such action? This should be incentive to figure out how, it's not even a

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread James Andrewartha
2009/12/27 John Smith : > 2009/12/27 John Henderson : >> John Smith wrote: >> >>> Your post was completely useless, why didn't you just post a bug >>> instead of trying to make other people do it? >> >> Because some of us are yet to build the confidence for such action? > > This should be incentive

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread John Smith
2009/12/27 James Andrewartha : > 2009/12/27 John Smith : >> 2009/12/27 John Henderson : >>> John Smith wrote: >>> Your post was completely useless, why didn't you just post a bug instead of trying to make other people do it? >>> >>> Because some of us are yet to build the confidence for s

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-26 Thread John Smith
2009/12/27 James Andrewartha : > than Ubuntu at fixing bugs, the equation still holds: > http://glyphobet.net/blog/blurb/1214 I should have seen this before replying, I agree 100%, I don't use potlatch so the cost v benefit for me is too high. ___ Talk-

Re: [talk-au] hiding boundary=administrative by default

2009-12-28 Thread Steve Bennett
I've submitted a request for Potlatch. http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2583#preview Boy what a weird thread. I'm still puzzling over how this: Steve: Hear, hear. Would be good in potlatch too. turned into: John: Your post was completely useless, why didn't you just post a bug instead of try