I think putting the coastline (natural=coastline) across the mouth of a
river (or a bay) is fine. This is quite common.
- Ben.
On 27 April 2011 19:16, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> Yep, and I added the coastline=imaginary tag to indicate that the line
> tagged as coastline which crosses the mouth o
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Franc Carter wrote:
>Yep - I will look in to that but from looking in to the code it looks
>hard(ish) as I don't see a generic approach for dealing with ways that
>are concatenated to form closed way.
Navit would then have problems rendering any multipolygon rela
[snip]
>
> I've been aiming to tag bays as areas rather than just a node in the
> centre. As a consequence my initial thought was to tag the area as
> natural=bay. Traditionally most renderers didn't render this as water.
> the OSM Mapnik style now does, but many others still don't. The
> problem
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Franc Carter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember there was a discussion a while ago tagging of bays - which
> I didn;t pay much attention too ;-(
>
> They now seem to be in a relation for each Bay, which is nice for
> defining the area of the bay. However there are no tags
ssage-
From: Franc Carter [mailto:franc.car...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 26 April 2011 7:59 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: [talk-au] navit and bays/coastline around Sydney
Hi,
I remember there was a discussion a while ago tagging of bays - which
I didn;t pay much attention too ;-(
Hi,
I remember there was a discussion a while ago tagging of bays - which
I didn;t pay much attention too ;-(
They now seem to be in a relation for each Bay, which is nice for
defining the area of the bay. However there are no tags on the ways
themselves and as a result Navit does nto render them
6 matches
Mail list logo
