Quoting Frank sundowne...@optusnet.com.au:
Here is a nice puzzel?
How would you tag a path that lies under an overhanging cliff?
So it is not a tunnel, nor under a bridge...
What about covered=yes (similar to roads under buildings)?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
Mark P.
Here is a nice puzzel?
How would you tag a path that lies under an overhanging cliff?
So it is not a tunnel, nor under a bridge...
Conceptually I view 'layer 0' as ground surface .. but in this
location/cross section there are 3 'layer 0's - the top of the cliff,
the path and the 'roof' of
Oooh! I'll bikeshed, err I mean bite!
Is the path underground, so could you use layer=-1? If not, then
layer=0 sounds good to me.
//Mike
On Fri, 4 Apr, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Frank sundowne...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Here is a nice puzzel?
How would you tag a path that lies under an
3 matches
Mail list logo