Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-14 Thread Paul HAYDON
adrianplask...@hotmail.com To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up. Message-ID: bay170-w62d1663b55b01b24ec62add2...@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi, adrian here, yeah don't assume no rpelies means no support - Ive just been

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-14 Thread Nathan Van Der Meulen
-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up. Message-ID:     caevnxz_ppgrltgt9w0ksdzwkp+x_ysyp7srel9nr2wo+-p+...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On 13 November 2012 17:38, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote: I may have

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-13 Thread Ian Steer
+1030 From: David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net To: Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com Cc: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up. Message-ID: f9190472150e1a55b5dbc16b6431e4600a9a4...@webmail.internode.on.net

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-13 Thread Andrew Harvey
On 13/11/12 20:29, Ian Steer wrote: I have been following this topic on a casual basis (ie I don't feel passionately about it), but I think that what you have written sounds fine. I guess that you will hear from people that feel passionately against your views, but those that think that what

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-13 Thread Adrian Plaskitt
Harvey) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:49:17 +0100 From: Michael Kr?mer ohr...@gmail.com To: Talk-AU OSM talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up. Message-ID

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-13 Thread Ross Scanlon
For rendering, no surface= or surface=asphalt/concrete/paved would produce the current rendering. Any other surface= would produce a dashed line/casing. To me that's a relatively simple distinction that would be more appealing to those maintaining the renderers. I've been working on this

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-12 Thread David Bannon
OK, I have to recognise that my proposed proposal is not attracting any support. So I will walk away. However, that leaves the problem unsolved and , I still think, dangerously so. Are there any alternatives folks ? Should we (ie in Australia) encourage people to use smoothness= for example ? I

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-12 Thread Ben Kelley
Hi. My 2c. It seems like there are a few issues here: 1 - The current mapnik style does not identify unpaved roads at all. 2 - For an unpaved road, the quality of the surface can vary a lot, and it would be good to have a way to tag this. 3 - Some roads require a 4WD. This can be a legal

Re: [talk-au] tagging 4WD and dirt roads - I give up.

2012-11-12 Thread Michael Krämer
Hi, Well, I'm one of those European countries with almost no unpaved roads - and therefore also think they should be rendered differently. A driver encountering an unpaved road here is usually quite confused if that's really an official road... But looking at some of the older discussions around