Re: [talk-au] roundabouts and footways/cycleways

2009-12-31 Thread John Smith
2010/1/1 Franc Carter : > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:31 PM, John Smith wrote: >> 2010/1/1 Franc Carter : >>> No rush from my perspective - I'm much more interested in the turn >>> restrictions, I am currently building a test VM so that I can narrow >>> down the issue and file a bug report >> >> Some

Re: [talk-au] roundabouts and footways/cycleways

2009-12-31 Thread Franc Carter
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:31 PM, John Smith wrote: > 2010/1/1 Franc Carter : >> No rush from my perspective - I'm much more interested in the turn >> restrictions, I am currently building a test VM so that I can narrow >> down the issue and file a bug report > > Someone is making a VM image with ev

Re: [talk-au] roundabouts and footways/cycleways

2009-12-31 Thread John Smith
2010/1/1 Franc Carter : > No rush from my perspective - I'm much more interested in the turn > restrictions, I am currently building a test VM so that I can narrow > down the issue and file a bug report Someone is making a VM image with everything setup you just need to tell it to download/process

Re: [talk-au] roundabouts and footways/cycleways

2009-12-31 Thread Franc Carter
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Liz wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Franc Carter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just an FYI that I spotted last night - current versions of navit >> appear to count exits that aren't navigable by the current vehicle >> (e.g footways when traveling by car) when calculating the e

Re: [talk-au] roundabouts and footways/cycleways

2009-12-29 Thread Liz
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Franc Carter wrote: > Hi, > > Just an FYI that I spotted last night - current versions of navit > appear to count exits that aren't navigable by the current vehicle > (e.g footways when traveling by car) when calculating the exit count. > > cheers do you want me to follow that