Hi All
As a mad mapper I have been following this debate with interest. I own one of
the fast graders. By that a standard family sedan setup for road performance
so understand that not all gravel roads are equal. I bushwalk and the access
to the walk governs the vehicle we take. I would
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
But your overall point is surely that as long as we have the basics, if some
group of people want the extra information and are willing to gather it, and
some other group of people want to use the information and are
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes people think that it's better to slice up information into
lots of little objective facts, like (in the case of mountain bike
trails), width, surface, grade, etc, rather than a subjective fact
like trail
I am not sure I agree with you Waldo.. (???).
Its useful in my opinion when ever storing data (of any nature) to think
about how that data will be used. While we will often find other use
cases later on, addressing the primary one is important.
I think very few users of map data are
David, to me your response seems to be mostly in agreement with what I
said. On what point, exactly, do you disagree?
Do you at least agree that a useful tag is one whose meaning is either 1)
immediately obvious (e.g. like width=*) OR 2) clearly/objectively described
in the wiki?
On Tue, May
5 matches
Mail list logo
