Talk-au
Digest, Vol 178, Issue 44)
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, 11:53 Andrew Davidson,
wrote:
>
> https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/14044389
>
>
> Cut and paste error there. The existing no u-turn restrictio
/relation/13761170
> > https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/13991446
> >
> > You broke 14 and added one new broken relation (13991446). While I was
> > deleting these I noticed that the intersection had some sort of
> > cross-y
So how's it going after this first month?
Any marked advantages / disadvantages over the existing mailing list?
Thanks
Graeme
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 12:52, Sam Wilson wrote:
> The new community.openstreetmap.org site is up and running.
>
> It's going to replace the old forum, including the
/relation/13761170
> > https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/13991446
> >
> > You broke 14 and added one new broken relation (13991446). While I was
> > deleting these I noticed that the intersection had some sort of
> > cross-your-heart thing going on with added ways f
; broken turn restriction relation was supposed to be doing.
>
> A couple of years ago I spent quite a bit of time fixing all the turn
> restrictions around AU, but I have to keep coming back every couple of
> months, as 100-200 newly broken ones get created every month. Mostly
> beca
ust a mapper with overpass, the JOSM validator, the
> to-do plugin, and many hours of puzzling over the question of what a
> broken turn restriction relation was supposed to be doing.
>
> A couple of years ago I spent quite a bit of time fixing all the tu
ictions (Was:Re: Talk-au
Digest, Vol 178, Issue 44)
Message-ID:
mailto:cacxr7k1ujx2wqzf5nsgxrd%2b6crp-upx7mpasjsvlogg5de9...@mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, 11:53 Andrew Davidson,
mailto:thesw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
&
tion relation was supposed to be doing.
>
> A couple of years ago I spent quite a bit of time fixing all the turn
> restrictions around AU, but I have to keep coming back every couple of
> months, as 100-200 newly broken ones get created every month. Mostly
> because iD will quietly
ctly the same routing information that
>>> was there before, but now in a simpler easier to maintain format.
>>>
>>> > <
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120198383#map=17/-34.76452/138.59301
>>> >
>>> > are two examples of t
>>
>> I am not a bot. Just a mapper with overpass, the JOSM validator, the
>> to-do plugin, and many hours of puzzling over the question of what a
>> broken turn restriction relation was supposed to be doing.
>>
>> A couple of years ago I spent quite a bit of time fixing al
uld stop doing it and I discovered that there isn't a way to do that
> in iD.
>
> My fixes should not be changing any routing outcomes as they are almost
> all deleting turn restrictions that iD didn't clean up after a mapper
> reconfigured an intersection. None of the examples you have poi
11 matches
Mail list logo
