Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridle Track

On 22/2/23 08:27, Mark Pulley wrote: On 21 Feb 2023, at 2:42 pm, Josh Marshall wrote: Australian road tagging guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads arguably override the general OSM guidelines, and they read: highway=track: "Service and

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridal Track

On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 14:46, Josh Marshall wrote: > A tangent, but I'm rather happy that iD _*finally_* fixed their English > description for =track (it included "unmaintained" for a long time; many > were quite annoyed at the original change to include that)... and I can't > find any

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridal Track

Ah, I think I've let the mapping of tracks local to me influence my stance too much. And for context of my interest here, my plan was to bikepack the Track but that got put off due to covid and family. The Australian guidelines don't say much about =tertiary, but bouncing over to the main

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridle Track

> On 21 Feb 2023, at 2:42 pm, Josh Marshall wrote: > > Australian road tagging guidelines at > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads > > arguably override the general OSM guidelines,

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridal Track

On 21/2/23 14:42, Josh Marshall wrote: Australian road tagging guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads arguably override the general OSM guidelines, and they read: highway=track: "Service and access roads that aren't part of the general road