Re: [talk-au] Ways to map boundaries that won't go into OSM

2019-07-01 Thread Paul Norman via Talk-au
On 2019-06-16 10:26 p.m., Ben Kelley wrote: Hi. A project I have been thinking about for a while is creating a map of Anglican (church) parish boundaries in Australia. In some sense these are like admin boundaries, but the source of the boundary is not easily verifiable. While the resulting

Re: [talk-au] "Removing closed or illegal trails." (in Nerang National Park)

2021-10-28 Thread Paul Norman via Talk-au
On 2021-10-28 8:05 p.m., osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: If it exists on the ground, it gets mapped. If there is no legal access, that's access=no or access=private. If it's a path that has been created by traffic where it's not officially meant to go, it's informal=yes. Yep, this

Re: [talk-au] Multiple web sites linked to car yard

2022-07-28 Thread Paul Norman via Talk-au
On 2022-07-28 4:22 p.m., Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: I saw something similar a little while back when clearing Notes. Same physical premises had 2 businesses operating out of it, one as general scrap metal & the other a car wrecker, but two different names, phone numbers & websites. OK or

Re: [talk-au] Multiple web sites linked to car yard

2022-07-28 Thread Paul Norman via Talk-au
On 2022-07-28 12:29 a.m., nwastra wrote: This mapper has added about a dozen similar businesses to the same car wrecker yard. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/freecarpickup/history#map=19/-33.93048/150.99878 I assume this is ok as they are linked to the same physical location. It's not okay

Re: [talk-au] OSM Attribution Q

2022-08-14 Thread Paul Norman via Talk-au
On 2022-08-14 3:23 a.m., Bob Cameron wrote: I likely have this wrong, but worth a question. Looking at petrolspy.com.au website for Theodore Qld and note that the sport and rec ground shows a remarkable similarity to the changes/updates I did 10 months ago, right down to the service road