Such a road will also be a member of two associatedStreet relations.
I've been mapping one like it in Schriek. Near the Schrieksesteenweg.
It starts as Langstraat, then is Langestraat on one side and
Langstraat on the other. Then it's Langestraat on one side and
Schrieksesteenweg on the other. To
I'd be delighted to be part of it...
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 17:44, Jo wrote:
> It would certainly be interesting to have such a meeting in Brussels.
> I know of a place in Schaarbeek (near the station) where it could take
> place, depending on how big you want it to become. (about 20 people
> ma
As the internet connection at the house is annoyingly switching on and
off all the time and Belgacom doesn't come to fix it before tomorrow,
I took refuge in STUK on Naamsestraat in Leuven.
If anybody feels like joining me here, you're welcome. I'm sitting on
the left side, near those double stair
It would certainly be interesting to have such a meeting in Brussels.
I know of a place in Schaarbeek (near the station) where it could take
place, depending on how big you want it to become. (about 20 people
max)
Jo
2011/11/8 Benoit Leseul :
> Hi all,
>
> As you may have noticed already, the Fre
Hi all,
As you may have noticed already, the FreeMeeting event (26 nov) has
been cancelled for this year. It probably was too ambitious to
organize at such short notice. Thanks to everyone who had volunteered,
and hopefully this event will happen next year.
Still, don't you think it would be inte
I agree with not splitting the road.
For the is_in problem, I suggest the same use of left and right.
is_in:left = LeftTown
is_in:right = RightTown
I have in my neighbourhood a road on the language border.
It has depending the side a different french (town of Wallonia) and
dutch name (town of F
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 15:00, Ben Laenen wrote:
>
> > name=Ieperleestraat-Neerstraat
> > name:left=Ieperleestraat
> > name:right=Neerstraat
>
>
> This is the method most people agree to and it's used internationally.
>
> Splitting the roads into two ways for each side is a very bad idea.
It's als
For the distinction between the amount of lanes on each side of the road
forward and backward is used.
The forward and backward keywords are also used for other elements.
More info: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
It seems consistent to use this to define the name of each side of the
r
>
> Or we could see both examples as different cases and use one tagging
> schema if they are in different cities and the other if they are in the
> same city. After all, these are two different reasons why a street might
> have two names.
>
Very good point, they are different situations.
Anyone
On Tuesday 08 November 2011 14:46:00 Sander Deryckere wrote:
> I'm not in favour of this. Since the road, at least mine in Ypres, is a
> road with just one lane, where you can go where you want. It would be the
> same like splitting buildings because there are more than one shop in it,
> instead of
That would work for your case (different names in different
cities/villages), but it won't work for mine (agreed, it's a very weird
case).
But I guess you also want a way to note which way is in which city/village.
Maybe mapping the complete street (including all houses with a complete set
of add
that's possible; or something like:
name=Ieperleestraat-Neerstraat
name:9000=Ieperleestraat
name:9800=Neerstraat
using the postal codes as distinction?
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Sander Deryckere wrote:
> I'm not in favour of this. Since the road, at least mine in Ypres, is a
> road with
I'm not in favour of this. Since the road, at least mine in Ypres, is a
road with just one lane, where you can go where you want. It would be the
same like splitting buildings because there are more than one shop in it,
instead of using POI to note the shops in the building. Splitting ways will
cau
The cleanest solution is probably to split the way into two, one way for
each direction and name them separately. This also seems like the only way
to have a correct "is_in", etc.
Best regards,
Dennis
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Sander Deryckere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This makes me think of a si
Hi,
This makes me think of a similar situation in Ypres:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/94237553
If someone knows a better solution, please share.
Greets,
Sander
2011/11/8 Ben Abelshausen
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure how to handle this, maybe it is somewhere on the wiki already?
>
> I h
Hello,
I'm not sure how to handle this, maybe it is somewhere on the wiki already?
I have this street (one of many):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/32206997
On one side the addresses use the streetname *lessensestraat *and the other
side *rekestraat *depending on the commune they are i
Hi Thanks Patrick for the report ...
I've reset the result.html page
so http://bmaron.net/osm_stats/unmapped/result.html is ok now...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Patrick Bous
Date: Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 14:05
Subject: [OSM-talk-be] Unmapped Of November ...
To: merz...@gmail.co
17 matches
Mail list logo
