[OSM-talk-be] Data ophalen uit overpass

2016-09-05 Thread Karel Adams
Zoals sommigen wel weten haal ik periodiek uit overpass de data op van de vliegvelden in Europa, om ze te vergelijken met andere publieke informatiebronnen. Nu begin ik beter te begrijpen waar ik nog problemen heb. Er zijn nl. twee manieren om een luchtvaartterein aan te geven: ofwel als een no

[OSM-talk-be] Note of wrong boundaries Lier Mechelen

2016-09-05 Thread Jakka
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/700751#map=17/51.16463/4.56282 Who knows To correct this note. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Note of wrong boundaries Lier Mechelen

2016-09-05 Thread joost schouppe
>From the note: Why "Lier Mechelen Lier" near this boundary line ??? Lier is not part of Mechelen and vice versa My answer: It actually is: it's part of the Arondissement Mechelen, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2524403 Maybe the rendering or the name tag should also include this "Arond

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Note of wrong boundaries Lier Mechelen

2016-09-05 Thread Wouter Hamelinck
> Maybe the rendering or the name tag should also include this "Arondissement" to lessen confusion Oh, no, not again. We've even voted over that already after a very lengthy discussion: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Belgium/Boundaries#Arrondissement_names

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Note of wrong boundaries Lier Mechelen

2016-09-05 Thread joost schouppe
> Oh, no, not again. We've even voted over that already after a very lengthy discussion: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Belgium/Boundaries#Arrondissement_names Well, it's been four ye

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Data ophalen uit overpass

2016-09-05 Thread Sander Deryckere
Ik ben niet echt vertrouwd met de XML taal van overpass, meer met de QL taal. In QL heb je de opties "out center" die van ieder object ook de coördinaten van het middelpunt geeft. Een er is ook "out geom" die van ieder object alle coördinaten geeft (maar niet als aparte nodes). Daarnaast heb je o

[OSM-talk-be] the newsletter

2016-09-05 Thread joost schouppe
In case you're not subscribed yet, we just sent out the second issue of our newsletter. Many thanks to Jorieke, Jonathan and Pierre for helping. You can read the message here in English [1], Dutch [2] or French [3]. We now have 338 subscribers, almost all of them adresses collected during Missing

Re: [OSM-talk-be] the newsletter

2016-09-05 Thread Bart Vanherck
Joost, Kan ik de nieuwsbrief ook ontvangen? mvg, Bart 2016-09-05 20:44 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe : > In case you're not subscribed yet, we just sent out the second issue of > our newsletter. Many thanks to Jorieke, Jonathan and Pierre for helping. > > You can read the message here in English [1