Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle

2018-01-18 Thread Marc Gemis
We had a similar discussion on the ring around Roeselare on the Riot/Matrix channel. Maybe it's time we rewrite the Belgian highway classification page to indicate that Nxxx & Rxxx are just indications for mapping and that traffic signs and road importance take precedence ? m On Fri, Jan 19, 201

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle

2018-01-18 Thread OSMDoudou
Thanks for the link. I hadn't discovered this page yet. On the other hand, the same page reads "Rx should also be tagged as motorways". R0 Brussels, R1 Antwerp and R4 Ghent are tagged like that. But R24 Nivelles, R20 Brussels, R9 Charleroi are tagged as trunks. And R52 Tournai, R36 Kortrijk and

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle

2018-01-18 Thread Marc Gemis
I think https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways gives the solution, there needs to be an F9 sign. If not, it is a primary. regards m On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:24 AM, OSMDoudou <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Can you help w

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle

2018-01-18 Thread OSMDoudou
Hello, Can you help with the B) part of the discussion ? What highway value is suitable for R50 ? Now that I discovered the local implicit characteristics thanks to the answer to question A), trunk is probably right, but I wanted to ask your views nonetheless. Thx. -Original Message