Re: [OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

I would only map them if they are signposted. So if there are signs indicating how you get from one dedicated fiets-o-strade section to another via "regular" roads, no problem. If there are no signs, let the router decide the route based on other tags. As for the concrete that has to be placed on

Re: [OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

The one in Antwerpen is now in OpenStreetMap, completely based on the KML file they provided. I don't see any correlation with boundaries we already had in OSM. Jo 2018-02-01 10:13 GMT+01:00 wannes : > Geen ervaring met importeren: kan (en MAG!) deze geimporteerd worden van > http://opendata.ant

Re: [OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

I mappped the one around Brussels: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7966939 Started with the boundary of the Brussels Region, then added all the exceptions for R0 and 3 parking lots. Jo 2018-02-01 15:36 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe : > They have explicitly asked to map this sometime back, so

Re: [OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

I don't know the details of this particular case, but if there is a real intention to be built the route, then why not map it as future ? OMS has tags to manage the life-cycle of past, present and future features. From: Tim Couwelier [mailto:tim.couwel...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, Feb

Re: [OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

I'll go with a 'no' here. Let me explain why: Both the main routes (fietsostrade, fietssnelweg, whatever you wish to call it) and the 'BFF' ('Bovenlokaal functioneel fietstroutenet) are by no means an indication of actual infrastructure being present, nor is it a measure of quality for the infrast

Re: [OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

In London some of the routes are mapped as proposed, it's a bit annoying if you don't know that they are just proposed and not actually there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6691788 Rendering is a dotted version of the normal line on the cycle layer: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18

[OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

Hi, I got an interesting question today. As the Flemish "fietsostrades" (fietssnelwegen, or cycle highways) are taking shape, so they are being mapped in OSM. People are already using the data, even though in reality, this is till very much a project. In more and more places, parts are completely

Re: [OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

They have explicitly asked to map this sometime back, so license-wise it's not a problem IMHO. The license was also meant to be as close as possible to the Flemish Open Data License, which is deemed OK. Should we go to imports for a single multipolygon? I don't know, but it sounds a little strange

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Overpass turbo exporteren as png

Hello, I think https://overpass-turbo.eu/master/ uses `master` branch from the Overpass Turbo repository (https://github.com/tyrasd/overpass-turbo) and that http://overpass-turbo.eu/ uses the last released version. Which means that https://overpass-turbo.eu/master/ has all the latest fixes a

Re: [OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

Geen ervaring met importeren: kan (en MAG!) deze geimporteerd worden van http://opendata.antwerpen.be/datasets/lage-emissiezone-afbakening http://opendata.antwerpen.be/gratis-open-data-licentie On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:52 AM, joost schouppe wrote: > Hi, > > There are now two low emission zones i

[OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

Hi, There are now two low emission zones in Belgium, neither of which is mapped. You will find all the needed info to map them on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dlow_emission_zone#Belgium Anyone up to the challenge? -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap