Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing in Liège

2016-09-14 Thread Julien Fastré
Le 14/09/2016 à 12:00, joost schouppe a écrit : > This example does look wrong to > me: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96664072 I have changed this road to tertiary. > > Maybe it would help if Michael would point out some example that look > wrong to him? Yes... > Le 14/09/2016 à 08:12,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing in Liège

2016-09-14 Thread joost schouppe
Just a quick overpass-turbo note: the circles you see are just to show that there are small ways (which you could easily overlook when zoomed out). This is a setting: go to Settings > Map > uncheck "show small features as a POI". ___ Talk-be mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing in Liège

2016-09-14 Thread Marc Gemis
Here's Michael's answer: I haven't read it thoroughly yet, so I leave the interpretation to each of you. - Your impression and the two answers make sence to me. It's hard to decide the road classification by aerial view. A look beside to google streetview also doesn't help (and I never would

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing in Liège

2016-09-13 Thread André Pirard
On 2016-09-13 18:21, Marc Gemis wrote: > Hallo, > > I was contacted by a mapper from Germany with whom I worked on turn:lanes. > He has to following question, can someone with local knowledge inform > us about the road classifications ? I have the impression a lot of > streets are indeed