[OSM-talk-be] Small landuse areas due to import - OK to merge ?
I made a walk in Hoge Vijvers, Arendonk yesterday. The area did not contain a lot of tracks and path yet. I started adding them based on my GPX tracks, Bing and AGIV. While doing this I noticed an area close to the Dutch border that has separate areas for each plot of trees and white space between them. We could expect paths there, but according to my notes this is not always the case. Is it OK to merge all those small areas together with the rest of the forest ? The area can be seen here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.366673707962036lon=5.106539726257324zoom=15 I expect it's caused by an import of Dutch data. m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Small landuse areas due to import - OK to merge ?
I think it's OK to do that. You can also remove all those source strings and refs referring to AND the DB is riddled with. Jo 2013/3/18 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com I made a walk in Hoge Vijvers, Arendonk yesterday. The area did not contain a lot of tracks and path yet. I started adding them based on my GPX tracks, Bing and AGIV. While doing this I noticed an area close to the Dutch border that has separate areas for each plot of trees and white space between them. We could expect paths there, but according to my notes this is not always the case. Is it OK to merge all those small areas together with the rest of the forest ? The area can be seen here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.366673707962036lon=5.106539726257324zoom=15 I expect it's caused by an import of Dutch data. m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
