Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bunkers

I was just following the wiki on that which says abandoned:building=bunker. I suppose that they see it as the building is abandoned, so it is the building that get the prefix. But i also thought like you at a first guess (i just followed how it was done on the wiki blindly). :-) Thus maybe we

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bunkers

are you sure it's not building=bunker abandoned:military=bunker ? my reasoning is: it's still a building, but no longer a military installation. m. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 5:16 PM Lionel Giard wrote: > > For abandonned (historic) military bunker, the correct mapping is : > -

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bunkers

excuus voor de mierenneukerij, maar het is relevant, denk ik: s/abandonned/abandoned/g ;) On 2020-03-17 16:15, Lionel Giard wrote: For abandonned (historic) military bunker, the correct mapping is : - abandonned:building=bunker - military=bunker - bunker_type=* (most of them are pillbox for

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bunkers

Hello, Le 17.03.20 à 16:26, rodeo .be a écrit : > I assume they were not visible because the tags were deprecated military=bunker isn't deprecated, it's the correct tag for a bunker still in military use. I found at least one currently visible mapped with a node

[OSM-talk-be] Bunkers

Hey all, I was driving around today, and saw some bunkers along the road that were not visible on the map. But they were tagged on OSM ... already 11y ago .. I assume they were not visible because the tags were deprecated. What are the