I think I did all the needed reverts. The tiles are being rerendered at the
moment.
I'll keep an eye on it, but feel free to contact me in case you see
anything weird

have a nice weekend

regards

m

On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This morning I got the following message:
>
> Goedenavond
>
> Het is mij toevallig opgevallen dat u vandaag bij het creƫren van enkele
> relaties (boundary postal_code) van Antwerpse gemeenten ook (allicht
> onbedoeld) verschillende grensnodes van andere gemeenten enkele kilometers
> hebt verplaatst. Het gaat meer bepaald om de gemeentegrenzen van Antwerpen 
> district
> Ekeren <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/62299>, Stabroek 
> Hoevenen<http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/60976>
>  , Kapellen <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/61255>, 
> Brasschaat<http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/408294>
>  enWuustwezel <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1284088> (en de
> wegen die daarmee jammer genoeg ook knopen delen, vooral de N11
> (Kapelsesteenweg) en zijstraten. Zou u dit eens kunnen nakijken en indien
> mogelijk kunnen corrigeren/reverteren? Het gaat onder meer om de de (nodes
> van) wegen 29293555 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29293555> , 
> 29262242<http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29262242>
>  ,2923146 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29293146> , 
> 86308084<http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86308084> en
> nog enkele andere in o.m. wijzigingensets 
> 19307695<http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19307695>
>  , 19307773 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19307695> ...
>
>
> This is caused by typing in a name of a relation in the josm editor panel.
> It sometimes executes a command then. I think a "Spiegelen" was executed on
> some relation.
>
> I know about the revert plugin in JOSM. I used it on the changeset. It
> generates 179 conflicts. I kept on clicking until they were all gone, but I
> ended up with a number of nodes without tags.
>
> I deleted that layer and tried to do a "Spiegelen" again, but can't find
> the right combination. I'm willing to look further into this, but I have
> some other obligations right now. So please don't edit in that area, or
> revert my stupidity.
>
> sorry !
>
> regards
>
> m
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to