Re: [Talk-ca] [Tagging] 0-0 address lines

2010-12-22 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote: ... and the reason for having a '0' was to show where (geometrically) it will be. So if people do know what the housenumber range actually is (or want to extrapolate it from statsCan) they are welcome to. Two

Re: [Talk-ca] [Tagging] 0-0 address lines

2010-12-22 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You might want to ask the talk-ca list... instead of tagging list :) Why would I want to subscribe to talk-ca just to ask a tagging question? It's the default value for CanVec when the data is not available.

Re: [Talk-ca] [Tagging] 0-0 address lines

2010-12-22 Thread Gordon Dewis
I have been wondering about them for a while, too. In fact, when tidying up links I often remove the annoying little 0-0 address ranges because they add nothing to the dataset. --G -Original Message- From: Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com Sender: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org