Re: [Talk-ca] [Tagging] 0-0 address lines

2010-12-22 Thread Gordon Dewis
I have been wondering about them for a while, too. In fact, when tidying up links I often remove the annoying little 0-0 address ranges because they add nothing to the dataset. --G -Original Message- From: Nathan Edgars II Sender: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org Date: Tue, 21 Dec 20

Re: [Talk-ca] [Tagging] 0-0 address lines

2010-12-22 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Sam Vekemans wrote: > Hi, > You might want to ask the talk-ca list... instead of tagging list :) > Why would I want to subscribe to talk-ca just to ask a tagging question? > > It's the default value for CanVec when the data is not available. So why is it being imp

Re: [Talk-ca] [Tagging] 0-0 address lines

2010-12-22 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Sam Vekemans wrote: > ... and the reason for having a '0' was to show where (geometrically) > it will be. > So if people do know what the housenumber range actually is (or want > to extrapolate it from statsCan) they are welcome to. Two comments on this: Why would