> I've read somewhere that the srtm data has, at best, 30m resolution. I don't
> know that it's resolved enough for hiking/snowshoeing/cross-country skiing? I
> can think of features where greater than 30m resolution would be helpful.
> Then again, I just looked at opencyclemap for that area aga
Hi Charles,
did you see the elevation profile feature on the Lonvia map? It only works
for properly defined trails that have exactly one start and one end point,
but in those cases it seems to do what you want it to. See for example here
http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/en/relation/3075304?zoom=1
Thanks all for the replies. (I'm replying only to Richard here, but I've
read each and every one.) At the point, the project is a demo that I
want to do and try to impress people with, so the objectives are really
mine. What I wanted was to show the leaflet-based slippy map and when
the user h
L'annalyse de Guillaume semble avoir du bon sens, mais Pierre a raison de
nous remettre au bon jugement du Comité Légal OSM: la communauté canadienne
ne peut effectivement s'improviser à accepter ou rejeter telle ou telle
licence, qu'elle soit "home-made" (municipale) ou générique: sinon les
portes
La ville de Québec vientde confirmer leur licence CC-By
voir la discussion avec Ville de Québec
https://twitter.com/pierzen/status/436259644810723328
Nous devons transmettre cette information au comité légal de la Fondation OSM
qui sera je pense en mesure d'évaluer la compatibilité de la licence
Bonjour,
Suite à la lecture du blog de Richard Weait:
http://weait.com/every-day-is-open-data-day
Je suis tombé sur cet outil qui permet d’évaluer la compatibilité des licences:
http://clipol.org/licences/70?tab=licence_compatibility
On y mentionne une incompatibilité entre CC-BY-4.0, la nouve
6 matches
Mail list logo
