Hi again,
Please accept again my apology!
So I want make it in right way, what we should do, some of you see our data
and did some queries too. If you accept to proceed next step (asking pnorman
to revert back the data) will allow me to do visual inspection (once again
as final verification) in
Hi all,
Please accept my apology for this misunderstanding, I thought our presence
for last OSM meeting and flowing emails in Talk-ca and with John were part
of communication and discussion, we launched our wikipage two weeks ago,
and we did not receive any feedback, so we thought to start import
Initial misunderstandings, emails round trips with the community… standard
communication process!
I do not know how others a seeing it, but reading about the process you use, I
do not see anything like a wild bulk import. At least, it is very similar to
the process I used when importing Canvec
Yeah, from the outside looking in I'm not seeing the huge surprise.
I'm not a community member, but I saw the initial emails from Mojgan,
and he's also talked to folks face-to-face. I didn't see an email
about the wiki page, but that could be because I wasn't paying
attention. What would a good
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Mojgan Jadidi wrote:
Mojgan,
We did say at MappyHour last month that OSM was filled with well intentioned
imports gone bad. Don't feel bad you seem to be well intentioned and many
others before you have made mistakes in the import process.
I don't think the advice you
Okay, so it looks like Paul Norman has started a revert through the DWG.
Thanks!
The thing is, the data did greatly improve addressing in Toronto. In the
areas I looked at, there was careful in-fill with no overlap in address
nodes/ranges.
My only real annoyance about this import was that it was
6 matches
Mail list logo
