On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, Nate Wessel wrote:
I for one would be happy to support a local effort to import high quality
buildings in Toronto and/or the GTA. I
think if we can actually meet up face to face our discussions may remain a bit
more civil and productive. Hopefully
consensus will be a bit
And several years later, here we are. I'm glad to see such a "new arrival" at
a place where good data can meet a good crowdsourced mapping database, and
furthermore, I wish the project all good luck.
SteveA
California
___
Talk-ca mailing list
My suggestion would be to amend and clean up the original import plan to
split out the country into regions and have a regional coordinator for
each region based on local input. I'd also add in the two other data
sources as alternative data sources.
The reason for this approach is an amended
And I totally agree. Because the Stat Can data has come from many
sources the data quality is variable to put it politely. The Microsoft
data has been shown in the US to also be of variable quality. I'm not
so sure about the NR Can LiDAR data hopefully it is at least consistent.
If we look
I for one would be happy to support a local effort to import high
quality buildings in Toronto and/or the GTA. I think if we can actually
meet up face to face our discussions may remain a bit more civil and
productive. Hopefully consensus will be a bit easier to achieve with
smaller groups
Hi all,
To be a bit more positive:
If we want to get buildings on the map, but we can't get Canada-wide
data improved by Statcan to a standard acceptable to all mappers in
Canada, IMO the best bet will be to split this into much smaller
batches and support local mappers who would be interested
Je comprends que c'est la saison des tomates. Mais essayons de les utiliser
pour nos conserves et non comme argument pour convaincre les autres
contributeurs ! ;)
Comme les autres l'ont exprimé, c'est à ceux qui proposent de faire des imports
de bien documenter le processus, non l'inverse. Et
7 matches
Mail list logo
